Ok everything to do with nutrition appears to be bro science according to the experts on here. We might as well be all eating like a dog with one feed a day it would seem.
My question is, does non-bro science exist as real science or is non-bro science just bro science in a cunning disguise? Has anyone credible actually demonstrated that serious weight training can be conducted on a completely unstructured nutrition protocol without limiting results?
There is lots of science about various hormone levels being affected by nutrient intake, how does non-bro science deal with these claims? Are they wrong, biased by supp companies or irrelevant as the fluctuations in hormone levels do not have the claimed effects on protein synthesis/catabolism?
These are serious questions. I couldn't be bothered doing the research myself but there seems to be plenty of people on here who already know so someone fill in the gaps for me please.
My question is, does non-bro science exist as real science or is non-bro science just bro science in a cunning disguise? Has anyone credible actually demonstrated that serious weight training can be conducted on a completely unstructured nutrition protocol without limiting results?
There is lots of science about various hormone levels being affected by nutrient intake, how does non-bro science deal with these claims? Are they wrong, biased by supp companies or irrelevant as the fluctuations in hormone levels do not have the claimed effects on protein synthesis/catabolism?
These are serious questions. I couldn't be bothered doing the research myself but there seems to be plenty of people on here who already know so someone fill in the gaps for me please.