Vader, note that
Policy Standards for Curriculum Planning and Programming, Assessing and Reporting to Parents K – 12 is a dead link; you could possibly argue that with no standards available, you had to make up your own. You could also point out that since they have a
guide to weightlifting, which describes weightlifting as
"Olympic lifts include the snatch and the clean and jerk. Power lifts include the squat, the bench press and the dead lift." - and these include deep knee bends and toe touches.
Thus, according to the NSW Education Dept, while doing a deep knee bend with 40kg on your back or touching your toes to pick up 60kg is okay, doing the same with no weight at all is dangerous.
So their standards are inconsistent. If they wish to reprimand Vader, they must at the same time abolish any and all weightlifting programmes in schools across the state.
i'm not sure who writes these completely stupid guidelines. most likely some soft cock education dept exec. We have an obesity problem in our country. what do we do? prevent them from doing decent exercise
Well, apparently we get them to play some kind of football. According to their publication,
How fit and active are students today?,
"less than half the number of young people in NSW have mastered all the fundamental motor skills tested (run, vertical jump, catch, overhead throw, kick and forehand strike)"
Now, in what way are these "fundamental motor skills"? Why are these particular motor skills chosen? Why not horizontal jump, underhand throw, safe lifting of heavy objects, and so on? Well... all those "fundamental motor skills" translate to football.
Thus, while touching your toes and doing a deep knee bend is considered inherently dangerous, having 12 stone of Year 8 fullback smash into you at a great rate of knots is considered just farken bonza, mate. Obviously some cocksmock in the Dept likes rugger.