If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.
Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.
Unless parallel has a new meaning (which it basically does in multi-ply) it wasn't even parallel. But deep compared to some of the other crap that gets put up.
Because multi-ply feds only give lip service to the term parallel.
I'm not taking anything away from the lifters themselves (that was still a fucking impressive squat), they all squat to the depth that will get passed, but rather the feds and judges which have departed so far from the definition of parallel they may as well be using some Non-Euclidean geometry.
Unless parallel has a new meaning (which it basically does in multi-ply) it wasn't even parallel. But deep compared to some of the other crap that gets put up.
It was deep by SPF standards. But I was more laughing at the head ref cheering him on with her hands in the air half way through the lift. That says it all really - he could've squatted an inch higher and they still would have passed it. It's all about the lifter after all. Not the lifter's fault obviously - looks like he could've gone an inch deeper if he was required to.