Because it is stupidly hard to put on muscle and not fat at the same time.
Your calorie/macro intake needs to be about 99% spot on.
Much easier to stuff your face for a few months, get big, then eat right for a couple of months and strip off the fat.
That and some of us (like me) are on a permanent (if a little slow) bulk
God bless u graham for having the spare time to answer questions!!
Graham for mod
Because it is stupidly hard to put on muscle and not fat at the same time.
Your calorie/macro intake needs to be about 99% spot on.
Much easier to stuff your face for a few months, get big, then eat right for a couple of months and strip off the fat.
That and some of us (like me) are on a permanent (if a little slow) bulk
Muscle Hypertrophy difference (assuming the person accurately knows their maintenance caloric intake) between someone with a 10% calorie surplus compared to someone with a 20-25% calorie surplus = Nothing.
Fat gain difference between the same equation = Much more fat gain in the higher surplus (that should be common sense).
Training adaptation and progression between the two = Nothing.
If you are going to do a bulk, IMO there is no need for a 20%+ surplus as it will make leaning up that little bit harder and it offers no extra benefit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?