better measure would be weight x distance moved = work done = kJ
eg, 17746kg moved 50cm each time = 17746x9.8x0.5/1000 = 87,000J
87kJ
how far in cm for each movement?
[/nerd]
better measure would be weight x distance moved = work done = kJ
eg, 17746kg moved 50cm each time = 17746x9.8x0.5/1000 = 87,000J
87kJ
how far in cm for each movement?
[/nerd]
Figures like '92302kg' are pretty meaningless.
A better question would be how many working sets you do per exercise...... Working set = coming within a few reps of whatever your max RM is.
I do 5 for bench at the moment, but I also do incline bench x 3 sets afterwards. I also do military press + tricep isolation in the same workout, 3-4 working sets a piece.
thats not taking into account any of the squishy factors at all.. just the mathematical work performed of moving weight that far. (work = force x distance)Yes it would BUT that still doesn't take into account the fatigue factor of the muscles. It would also not take into account the time factor in moving the weight which would increase the amount of work performed. Biological systems always make physics annoying.
I can't believe I unhid your post to read that....You'd only be lying to yourself though
I use total volume lifted in training the whole time and because I'm consistent with my main training I know how volume is supposed to look and decide my entire training around total number of bar lifts and total volume lifted so I can get direct feedback at the end of each session about whether or not my previous training sessions in the cycle have put me on target to match the number of bar lifts and total volume lifted for the month. It doesn't mean I go "oh I need to get 40,000kg this week I'll just lift the bar for 500 reps once a week"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?