• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.
Nope. Any speed of movement has momentum.

To move the bar faster and gain more momentum requires more force from the muscles to move at that faster speed.

I use the term "momentum" in this case to describe the movement of the bar being propelled without the use of the muscle providing force powered by muscular contraction.

In another way, using the seated leverage row, or cable, its the same, you are required to move the lever, say 800mm, with fresh strength you have the power to move the lever so fast that 350mm of that movement is provided by the force of the muscle exceeding the weight that is being moved, so the first 450mm of that movement is actually being moved by the muscle providing force which is ideal, the last 350 isn't which is not productive.
to add, the only thing slowing that down is friction or gravity or both, trying to stop the movement prior to that exposes the muscles to unnecessary high force.

if you still don't understand what i mean I'd be more than happy to show you at the place where my stuff is (PTC) as opposed to having silly convo's on a forum.

But I'm not really sure whether you just like an argument or whether you'd really like to try to understand what I mean.
If it's the later, I'm not really interested in discussing anything with you further, no hate, just find it boring.
 
I use the term "momentum" in this case to describe the movement of the bar being propelled without the use of the muscle providing force powered by muscular contraction.

In another way, using the seated leverage row, or cable, its the same, you are required to move the lever, say 800mm, with fresh strength you have the power to move the lever so fast that 350mm of that movement is provided by the force of the muscle exceeding the weight that is being moved, so the first 450mm of that movement is actually being moved by the muscle providing force which is ideal, the last 350 isn't which is not productive.
to add, the only thing slowing that down is friction or gravity or both, trying to stop the movement prior to that exposes the muscles to unnecessary high force.

if you still don't understand what i mean I'd be more than happy to show you at the place where my stuff is (PTC) as opposed to having silly convo's on a forum.

But I'm not really sure whether you just like an argument or whether you'd really like to try to understand what I mean.
If it's the later, I'm not really interested in discussing anything with you further, no hate, just find it boring.

I suggest you look up the scientific explaination and formulas behind momentum and force. You are getting it wrong.

Momentum = mass x velocity. If the bar is moving there is always momentum. You cannot lift without imparting momentum on the bar.
 
you rep 10 with a given weight and on the last rep you have fatigued the positive portion of the rep, you can make more inroad to fatigue useing the negative portion of the rep by swinging the weight up (using your body to swing the bar up and then real slowly lowering, do that a couple of times really stimulates some growth.

Just out of interest, from an Eric Helms atricle -

One of the reasons that the common recommendation is to go slow on the eccentric
portion when training for hypertrophy is because of the focus on eccentric muscle
actions as a training tool in exercise science. I call this a ‘muscle action’ rather than a
contraction because unlike the concentric, the eccentric is not an active contraction in
the same manner - the eccentric portion of a lift is when you are lowering the weight.
The muscle is lengthening because you are producing less force than is needed to resist
the load; which can occur involuntarily because the weight is too heavy, or voluntarily
when you are controlling a load into position (for example, setting a coffee cup down).
This is an important distinction because many people often only think of movement in
concentric terms. So for example, when I pick up a cup of coffee, the bicep shortens
and the load is brought to my mouth. When I lower it, the triceps aren’t pulling it down,
the bicep controls the tension to lower it; this is the eccentric phase. Using an exercise
example, the eccentric portion of a squat is when you lower the bar (and yourself) into
position, and then the concentric is when you squat it up. On a deadlift, unlike a squat,
you begin with the concentric, and then when you lower it down this is the eccentric
portion of the lift.
First let’s discuss some of the ins and outs of eccentrics. Because an eccentric action
is not active in the same way that a concentric contraction is, it requires less energy.
Also, you don’t have to overcome the inertia of the load - you’re just lowering it. Finally,
an eccentric action occurs as the muscle lengthens, which “loads” the structure of the
muscle in a way that generates force (think of pressing down on a stretched rubber
band). For all of these reasons, you are substantially stronger eccentrically than
concentrically [3].
Think about this logically - the amount you can lower ‘into the hole’ in a squat is more
than you can stand up with. That’s why when people miss squats it typically happens
on the way up. Same thing with bench, you lower it to your chest and then typically get
stuck trying to get it up off the chest.
So you are stronger eccentrically than you are concentrically, and because of that in
studies on eccentric only training, more volume can be performed (remember sets x
reps x load).
Now you are probably wondering where I am going with this. What does this have to
do with tempo, and why you should care about eccentric only training since it’s difficult
to do for most exercises outside of a laboratory?

Well bear with me, what I’m trying to do is express that the main reason why eccentrics
are thought to be a useful training modality for developing strength and hypertrophy
in the literature, is probably because you can lift heavier [3] - so you produce more
tension, and more volume (which takes us back to Level 2 of The Pyramid - VIF).
Now unfortunately, some people who read exercise science texts or research, and then
generate content based on that, don’t necessarily understand this mechanism behind
eccentric training and also don’t understand that what you can do in a lab doesn’t
always necessarily translate to real training.
If you don’t have the equipment to load the eccentric portion heavier while making
the concentric portion lighter (or eliminate it completely), such as is done in many
studies, how can you translate the effectiveness of eccentric training to free weights
and machines?
One thought process is that if the eccentric is so important, you should spend more
of your time lifting on the eccentric vs. the concentric. An example would be to lift
with a normal speed on the way up performing the concentric, but to lift slowly on the
eccentric on the way down. The thought is that by accentuating the eccentric action it
will create more growth.
Hopefully now you’re seeing why I spent time explaining the mechanism behind why
eccentric training can be effective. Understanding these reasons should help you realize
that excessive slowing of the eccentric phase of a lift runs contrary to the benefits of
eccentric training. The amount of load you can lift in the gym with a machine or a free
weight is limited by your concentric strength, the weakest link in the chain. So it doesn’t
really make sense from a conceptual standpoint to do excessively slow eccentric actions
to try to get greater hypertrophy, because the whole reason we do eccentrics is to lift
heavier, but we can’t lift heavier than we can lift concentrically in the gym. So you’ll
be limited by your concentric strength, and then you won’t be using the type of heavy
loading that makes eccentric training beneficial.
 
I suggest you look up the scientific explaination and formulas behind momentum and force. You are getting it wrong.

Momentum = mass x velocity. If the bar is moving there is always momentum. You cannot lift without imparting momentum on the bar.
Yes and to cheat you are USING that momentum in your favour .
Come on Bazza you know what is meant here
 
I suggest you look up the scientific explaination and formulas behind momentum and force. You are getting it wrong.

Momentum = mass x velocity. If the bar is moving there is always momentum. You cannot lift without imparting momentum on the bar.

Yeah I know, what powers the velocity in the case of the barbell or moment arm?
and how does that effect the muscle to try and stop it?
 
Just out of interest, from an Eric Helms atricle -

One of the reasons that the common recommendation is to go slow on the eccentric
portion when training for hypertrophy is because of the focus on eccentric muscle
actions as a training tool in exercise science. I call this a ‘muscle action’ rather than a
contraction because unlike the concentric, the eccentric is not an active contraction in
the same manner - the eccentric portion of a lift is when you are lowering the weight.
The muscle is lengthening because you are producing less force than is needed to resist
the load; which can occur involuntarily because the weight is too heavy, or voluntarily
when you are controlling a load into position (for example, setting a coffee cup down).
This is an important distinction because many people often only think of movement in
concentric terms. So for example, when I pick up a cup of coffee, the bicep shortens
and the load is brought to my mouth. When I lower it, the triceps aren’t pulling it down,
the bicep controls the tension to lower it; this is the eccentric phase. Using an exercise
example, the eccentric portion of a squat is when you lower the bar (and yourself) into
position, and then the concentric is when you squat it up. On a deadlift, unlike a squat,
you begin with the concentric, and then when you lower it down this is the eccentric
portion of the lift.
First let’s discuss some of the ins and outs of eccentrics. Because an eccentric action
is not active in the same way that a concentric contraction is, it requires less energy.
Also, you don’t have to overcome the inertia of the load - you’re just lowering it. Finally,
an eccentric action occurs as the muscle lengthens, which “loads” the structure of the
muscle in a way that generates force (think of pressing down on a stretched rubber
band). For all of these reasons, you are substantially stronger eccentrically than
concentrically [3].
Think about this logically - the amount you can lower ‘into the hole’ in a squat is more
than you can stand up with. That’s why when people miss squats it typically happens
on the way up. Same thing with bench, you lower it to your chest and then typically get
stuck trying to get it up off the chest.
So you are stronger eccentrically than you are concentrically, and because of that in
studies on eccentric only training, more volume can be performed (remember sets x
reps x load).
Now you are probably wondering where I am going with this. What does this have to
do with tempo, and why you should care about eccentric only training since it’s difficult
to do for most exercises outside of a laboratory?

Well bear with me, what I’m trying to do is express that the main reason why eccentrics
are thought to be a useful training modality for developing strength and hypertrophy
in the literature, is probably because you can lift heavier [3] - so you produce more
tension, and more volume (which takes us back to Level 2 of The Pyramid - VIF).
Now unfortunately, some people who read exercise science texts or research, and then
generate content based on that, don’t necessarily understand this mechanism behind
eccentric training and also don’t understand that what you can do in a lab doesn’t
always necessarily translate to real training.
If you don’t have the equipment to load the eccentric portion heavier while making
the concentric portion lighter (or eliminate it completely), such as is done in many
studies, how can you translate the effectiveness of eccentric training to free weights
and machines?
One thought process is that if the eccentric is so important, you should spend more
of your time lifting on the eccentric vs. the concentric. An example would be to lift
with a normal speed on the way up performing the concentric, but to lift slowly on the
eccentric on the way down. The thought is that by accentuating the eccentric action it
will create more growth.
Hopefully now you’re seeing why I spent time explaining the mechanism behind why
eccentric training can be effective. Understanding these reasons should help you realize
that excessive slowing of the eccentric phase of a lift runs contrary to the benefits of
eccentric training. The amount of load you can lift in the gym with a machine or a free
weight is limited by your concentric strength, the weakest link in the chain. So it doesn’t
really make sense from a conceptual standpoint to do excessively slow eccentric actions
to try to get greater hypertrophy, because the whole reason we do eccentrics is to lift
heavier, but we can’t lift heavier than we can lift concentrically in the gym. So you’ll
be limited by your concentric strength, and then you won’t be using the type of heavy
loading that makes eccentric training beneficial.

the other thing that the negative portion of the exercise provides is the stretch, which is the only truly beneficial means of improving the muscles flexibility
 
the other thing that the negative portion of the exercise provides is the stretch, which is the only truly beneficial means of improving the muscles flexibility

But does it? To literally stretch the sarcomeres of the muscle should the muscle not be as elongated as possible? Take the preacher DB curl for example; once you reach failure (or thereabouts) you can start doing slow negatives resulting in a more intense feeling which may be described as a 'stretch'. However, unless your elbow is locked out the muscle is nowhere near it's full length. I'm not calling bullshit, I'm asking the question.
 
To clarify, surely a muscle can only be stretched in a certain position or at a certain point of it's ROM. Therefore it isn't the action of a slow negative which provides a stretch. However, if you are applying weight to the muscle in the muscles extended position it will be stretching the muscle (beyond it natural end point of ROM). The same as using body pressure to stretch your hamstrings or any other muscle, just using a weight to apply the force.
 
But does it? To literally stretch the sarcomeres of the muscle should the muscle not be as elongated as possible? Take the preacher DB curl for example; once you reach failure (or thereabouts) you can start doing slow negatives resulting in a more intense feeling which may be described as a 'stretch'. However, unless your elbow is locked out the muscle is nowhere near it's full length. I'm not calling bullshit, I'm asking the question.

Yeah well you have the agonist and antagonistic relationship when one muscle contracts the other relaxes.
using the curl movement as an example if the movement is using resistance controlled by a hydrolic system then the contraction movement is powered by the bicep and the tricep relaxes, the negative portion is powered by the tricep and the bicep is relaxed, very different when using a barbell.

thats the best way I can explain not a good writer.
 
i get what you're saying, and we'll just need to agree to disagree due to the heading of the topic, but it is certainly possible to stimulate growth by using a moment where the muscles only are doing the work and not momentum are positioning the body to improve leverage, at the end of the day it's progress, and to keep progressing into senior years it has to be done safely.
I wanted to get in on this topic but it was moving too fast to comment before.

Momentum will not do any work for you in the gym. Momentum is evidence that the work has already been done. If a barbell is moving then a force has been exerted on it either by muscular contraction or by gravity.

Sent from my R7sf using Tapatalk
 
I wanted to get in on this topic but it was moving too fast to comment before.

Momentum will not do any work for you in the gym. Momentum is evidence that the work has already been done. If a barbell is moving then a force has been exerted on it either by muscular contraction or by gravity.

Sent from my R7sf using Tapatalk

yeah, that's good.
 
popcorn_yes.gif
 
Top