It's pretty clear what I said woody but you're too busy being a ćunt to want to understand anything beyond your narrow view,, I also said that strength is a subjective term therefore it's not absolute, think for a fucken minute.
OK, I think I may be a bit retarded because I have no idea what dafuq you are on about. Here is an exact copy of your post:
Realise that strength is not an absolute, it is subjective term and many 'cheat' methods can and are used when demonstrating strength.
I'm not having a go at you here (that will come later), I just want to understand clearly what you are saying.
So, what i take from this, and I may be unable to comprehend the exact intent of your statement, but you seem to be saying that strength is not an absolute because it can't be measured or quantified or accurately compared from one strength performance to another.
Is that correct?
You are placing strength along with "looks" (e.g. a bodybuilding comp which is all about how you look, nothing else) or some other non quantifiable attribute such as "compatibility" (e.g. between friends or couples) or asking what's the best song or movie or colour. There is no absolute with those things because there are no standards for what is a personal choice. In other words, there is no "right" answer. It's unquantifiable. In the same way, you are saying that strength is not absolute because it's purely subjective, unable to be accurately measured between two people, or even comparing yourself from one week to the next.
Is that what you are saying?
I assume this because you then go on to say that strength is subjective, and not absolute, as "
many 'cheat' methods can and are used when demonstrating strength." From that I assume you are referring to something like the deadlift, where you can have two basic stances plus a third blend of the two: sumo and conventional, with one or more of those being less than pure in form, a "cheat" if you will, even though it's within the rules. Sort of like having a huge arch in the bench press. It's legal, but a bit of a "cheat" for some (almost always those, like me, who don't have a spine that flexible).
Or, in weightlifting you can have a clean and jerk with a split jerk or a less traditional squat jerk. Both are allowed, but the split jerk is considered "normal" or "conventional", even though the squat jerk is actually harder (for most) to accomplish.
Is the above a reasonable summation of the point you are trying to make? If not, could you clarify if for me, because if I am way off track, probably everyone else is too, except @
Goosey who is a frikken genius.