Ok, thanks for your thoughts.I would say yes (but have limit experience) in that you are targeting your legs directly, promotiny new growth as you a performing different exercises with different load to you hay day. my thoughts
I think I'm your case that you should be able to get them back to where they have previously been
I would guess you could build a good set of legs with just isolation. .
Leg Extensions only?
Why not. Work them hard enough. Why wouldn't you get good legs. Got to also do something for the hams as well though.
And good as in better than 95% of the general population, not saying you should do that if you want to step on stage.
You think all the talk of Leg Extensions destroying the knee is all guff?
Secondly, a Man in his 50s would prolly want to stimulate his natural Test, HGH, IGF-1 etc as much as possible with the bigger lifts I would have assumed.
Thank you for your input Sir, you know I very much appreciate it.You think all the talk of Leg Extensions destroying the knee is all guff?
Secondly, a Man in his 50s would prolly want to stimulate his natural Test, HGH, IGF-1 etc as much as possible with the bigger lifts I would have assumed.
Thank you for your input Sir, you know I very much appreciate it.
Now let's move on to destroying two myths whilst we at it shall we...
There's no such thing as a gain in MPS through whatever minuscule amount of hormone released through training, even your mighty squats and dead lifts effort would fail to stimulate enough, or the required anabolic hormones to provide one with additional muscle growth.
Second myth I like to smash today is the training and catabolic effect through some rise in cortisol. Again and just the same as the so called anabolic hormones stimulous, there's such a minuscule amount that it's not going to have that negative or detrimental effect bodybuilders have been talking about for years.
Now I do not take credit for the above new and latest information, however all the credit must go to the professor himself, Dr. Stuart Phillips, whose videos I've already put up in my journal. Please do not take my word for what I'm sharing with you here Sir, but do like I did and email the professor directly if you wish him to send you his studies or at least explain how it is that such a minuscule amount of either anabolic or catabolic hormones during training would not elicit the effect magazines keep on raving about. Thank you, I've taken more than enough of your time, which like I said earlier, I sincerely do appreciate.
And I very much appreciate and respect your opinion.I think I'm your case that you should be able to get them back to where they have previously been but unsure if it would work for a novice or someone starting from scratch. Muscle memory should get you a long way but my opinion is that you need a compound movement for overall development. That goes for anything, not just legs. But again, it's just my opinion.
Thank you Barry, what you say makes a lot of sense to me.Why not. Work them hard enough. Why wouldn't you get good legs. Got to also do something for the hams as well though.
And good as in better than 95% of the general population, not saying you should do that if you want to step on stage.
Thank you for your input Sir, you know I very much appreciate it.You think all the talk of Leg Extensions destroying the knee is all guff?
Secondly, a Man in his 50s would prolly want to stimulate his natural Test, HGH, IGF-1 etc as much as possible with the bigger lifts I would have assumed.
Thank you for your input Sir, you know I very much appreciate it.
Now let's move on to destroying two myths whilst we at it shall we...
There's no such thing as a gain in MPS through whatever minuscule amount of hormone released through training, even your mighty squats and dead lifts effort would fail to stimulate enough, or the required anabolic hormones to provide one with additional muscle growth.
Second myth I like to smash today is the training and catabolic effect through some rise in cortisol. Again and just the same as the so called anabolic hormones stimulous, there's such a minuscule amount that it's not going to have that negative or detrimental effect bodybuilders have been talking about for years.
Now I do not take credit for the above new and latest information, however all the credit must go to the professor himself, Dr. Stuart Phillips, whose videos I've already put up in my journal. Please do not take my word for what I'm sharing with you here Sir, but do like I did and email the professor directly if you wish him to send you his studies or at least explain how it is that such a minuscule amount of either anabolic or catabolic hormones during training would not elicit the effect magazines keep on raving about. Thank you, I've taken more than enough of your time, which like I said earlier, I sincerely do appreciate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?