Here we have PA taking baby steps towards sensible rules (5 year masters classes, no need for jockey style underwear, etc) while our new APU fed is being pushed to consider taking 5 steps back into the dark ages.
I call horseshit.
woody, you are such a smart ass.
i remember one person stopping a fed from competing at a certain venue because it was not a certain type of fed.
but good try.
yes. the world powerlifting federation will suit you. enjoy.
hey woody,
i think asking the asc for clariification is smart imo, especially when ownership of the venue is by a senior official of another federation with vastly diferent rules.
and it is an apu rule that hosting an apu meeting requires apu membership.
Why should venue owners have to be members, especially if they aren’t running the meet?
Woild yoi expect the owner of the local local pub be an owner if you held a comp there?
and it is an apu rule that hosting an apu meeting requires apu membership.
haha nothings changed round these parts,chris still getting owned.loool
I didn’t realize it was an actual rule.
Where is it written?
And by hosting do you mean meet director? Or venue owner? Because they are 2 different things.
Tish, my wife, is the meet director, and will be a financial member.
Or or does it say the venue Owner must be also? Because that would be silly IMO.
Thank you. I'm flattered.
Dafuq has that got to do with anything? Maybe to clarify you could get a pair and provide the details. Or is this one of those "Father O'leary raped a boy once so it's OK for me to do it" type of bullshit lines of reasoning?
you are someone that has little knowledge about powerlifting history in Australia. it is common knowledge about how a person stopped another fed from using a certain venue. do some research.
again, good lifting with world powerlifting.