Thanks for the video Fadi.
I'm one step in front of you though. I already have the broomstick. Actually, it's a piece of heavy dowel, about 25mm diameter and longer than my full arm stretch. I bought it for shoulder dislocates and while using it, I thought that going one step further would be a fun idea: using it to practice snatches.
I also am expecting a new barbell to arrive either this week or in about another month or two (depending on the courier beating the christmas rush) and will use that as the next step, doing practice lifts with the empty bar.
But first I wanted to find out how to do the lifts properly so that I don't have to relearn stuff later. Or get injured. It would be embarrassing to get an injury with an empty bar. Or a broomstick for that matter.
I have started watching this vid as well. It has an interesting point on where to hold the bar so that it sits in the right position when just standing upright. But still have yet to watch it all.
I've watched the three videos as you've uploaded them. Regarding the point where to hold the bar, I've got this to say: there are more than one method of assessing the width of the hands on a bar, and all do give equally good results. However I subscribe to none, and (I believe) for a good reason. Many a time, a coach hinders a lifter's capabilities simply because they choose to do things by the book. I on the other hand choose to do things by the lifter's imprinted book, the book that makes you you, the individual lifter.
The way I feel about the methods that help assess the width of the hands on a lifting bar, is the same way I regard someone telling you where to place your feet when you squat, for best results.
My method is here's the bar, now grab it and lift it. I don't tell you where your hands should grab it, in fact not even your own intellect factors (or ought to) factor in here, only your body's mechanics and the feedback they give you, ought to stand in judgment of exactly where your hands and feet width ought to be for
you.
If the above sounds too simplistic, and/or you prefer a detailed methodology of how and why you ought to do this or that, then in me (at least), you'd find someone who really does not subscribe to such rigidity. I'm all for standing back, and allowing the lifter to show me what he can do. Then, and only then would I add my input, and only where is needed, lest I rob that lifter of his true potential by having him fixed into
my mould of txt book lifting.
I know the reason for why I'm different from the norm. It's because my command of the English language was not at its best back in 1980 (two and half years after arriving in Oz). So the less words spoken and the more lifting done the better. Sure there are some fundamentals to lifting a weight off the ground etc., and that ought to be taken care of, but even that does not need a spoken word to be uttered. Silent coaching, where the only sound made is the sound of that Olympic weightlifting bar smashing onto the platform. There's more to be said, but it suffice to say that your best bet to learning the Olympic lifts, is to have a proficient coach who has been there done that (as far as knowing how to lift himself), to guide you through only where is necessary.
People who turn Olympic weightlifting into some complicated txt books have - well, txt books to sell and /or a "magical" way of teaching that perhaps no one has known before. We both know there's no magic formula, and I'm here to give you 100% assurance that you sir, have it within you to lift in the same manner I was lifting.
Sorry for the above novel, but I know you're an anti BS man, hence my words above were written.
Thank you.